Ribbon-cutting officially opens new Pima Town Hall

Pima Mayor Brian Paull and Vice Mayor Sherrill Teeter cut the Graham County Chamber of Commerce ribbon Tuesday, officially opening the new Pima Town Hall. - David Bell Photo/Gila Valley Central

PIMA — Pima town officials now have a little more space in which to operate.

The new Town Hall, occupying the old Justice Court building, was opened with a Graham County Chamber of Commerce ribbon-cutting Tuesday.

“It’s great,” said Mayor Brian Paull. “It’s a great building and the guys in the town did a good job of getting it ready. And the (council dais) looks amazing. They did a great job.”

The grand opening event also included tours of the new space, giveaways of town-branded items such as hats and mugs, and cupcakes by Kam’s Cakes and Bakes.

Following the ribbon-cutting, the Town Council conducted its regular monthly meeting, where the council considered annexing land into the town. Property owner Paul Charette is seeking to bring his 34-acre parcel of land into the town in order to connect to sewer when it becomes available, as well as have regular police patrols in the area.

Paul Charette is asking to annex his 34 acres of land – bordered by West 1400 South, North Cluff Ranch Road, West Yuma Street and South 200 West – into the Town of Pima. He plans to develop an RV resort on the property. – Contributed Graphic/Graham County GIS

Last year, the county approved zoning for the land to house an RV park, something Charette said he’d continue to like to do if the land is annexed into the town.

“The initial phase is 41 spaces, that’s been all engineered, designed (and) ready for development,” Charette said. “If all goes well, I’m anticipating doing a second phase, with another 50 spaces, plus or minus. That hasn’t been engineered yet. And then I anticipate a third phase; I was going to do a manufactured home subdivision.”

The Town Council voted 4-1 to begin the process of annexation, which includes a number of public hearings. Council member Teresa Bailey voted against, citing uncertainty over the impact on the town’s infrastructure.

Comments

comments